... IS THE RIGHT TO BELIEVE IN DEMOCRACY, DEPENDING ON THE CIRCUMSTANCES.'
I've just decided this would be a lot better on the banner of the 'blog of the decent left', Harry's Place. It was inspired by a comment of one of its heterosexual Contributers, 'Sarah AB' when hedging her bets on whether or not it is wrong to arrest Christians if they express a biblical view on homosexuality.
Having been banned I was then unbanned there, and then amid mutual backslapping over how true to their principles they are, my last two posts have been blocked. I have asked Sarah to have the honour to publically state this giving the mutual backslapping going on about them not doing this, and have offered her the helpful advice of changing her banner slogan to the above.
My two last comments she wouldn't post were concerning her willingness to have someone clearly malevolent and unhinged as 'Flaming Fairy', who obfuscates the disproportionate incidence of paedophilia among homosexuals (a minimum of 300%), babysit for her little boy. I found it very disturbing that she as a mother, would have a homosexual who would teach her little boy that homosexuality is normal babysit, but not a Christian who wouldn't even broach the subject of sex. Chilling. This is what you have to do to fit in with the new age fascism in today's Labour Party - put your children at risk to prove 'ideological purity'. If you have time to go through the comments on her post Brendan O'Neill on Gay Marriage, you may share my view that she is clearly intimidated by the homosexual fascists she rubs shoulders with in the Labour Party. And HP is the blog of the 'decent left'!! Another banner might be 'Liberty, if it means anything, is the right to choose which fascisms you like and dont like'. It's homosexual Contributers, Gene and Alec - especially Alec - have a visceral hatred of Judeo/Christian sexual morality that might make even Richard Dawkins blanche.
This is the last post of mine she blocked:-
While dcook and I disagree on homosexuality, I thought his post above from a democratic perspective was excellent. One thing I would take issue with him on though is the following:-
If the Church wants to believe that homosexuality is wrong then while I don’t agree with them I would defend their right to hold that view. (I believe Peter Thatchell says the same thing)
I didn't get this impression when Peter Tatchell and his chums at OUTRAGE! hijacked Easter Sunday Service at Canterbury Cathederal because the then Archbishop of Canterbury, George Carey, didn't see eye to eye with Mr Tatchell on homosexuality.
While we're at it, we may as well take a look at what Mr Tatchell (occasional HP Contributer) thinks of having sex with children:-
The letter, dated 26 June 1997, is reproduced in full below
ROS Coward (Why Dares to Speak says nothing useful, June 23) thinks it is “shocking” that Gay Men’s Press has published a book, Dares To Speak, which challenges the assumption that all sex involving children and adults is abusive. I think it is courageous.
The distinguished psychologists and anthropologists cited in this book deserve to be heard. Offering a rational, informed perspective on sexual relations between younger and older people, they document examples of societies where consenting inter-generational sex is considered normal, beneficial and enjoyable by old and young alike.
Prof Gilbert Herdt points to the Sambia tribe of Papua New Guinea, where all young boys have sex with older warriors as part of their initiation into manhood. Far from being harmed, Prof Herdt says the boys grow up to be happy, well-adjusted husbands and fathers.
The positive nature of some child-adult sexual relationships is not confined to non-Western cultures. Several of my friends – gay and straight, male and female – had sex with adults from the ages of nine to 13. None feel they were abused. All say it was their conscious choice and gave them great joy.
While it may be impossible to condone paedophilia, it is time society acknowledged the truth that not all sex involving children is unwanted, abusive and harmful.
Thoughts anybody?? Alec, Flaming Fairy, Lamia? Anything you'd like to share?
Alas, we shall never know. I wonder if Sarah would have Peter Tatchell babysit for her?